GDPR & AI Compliance Expert

Your privacy policy says one thing. Your system does another.

I check if your system actually matches your compliance claims.

Based on real-world audits of complex systems.

Scroll

Most companies have the documents.
Not the reality.
And that's where the real risk is.

Privacy policies
Carefully drafted, legally reviewed, published.
Cookie banners
Consent mechanisms in place, categories defined.
Legal documents
DPAs signed, RoPA maintained, DPO appointed.

But your actual system behavior often does not match.

That gap creates risk. Regulators don't fine you for missing paperwork. They fine you for what your systems actually do — and the paper trail that proved you knew.

What I actually check.

01
Review data flows
Map where personal data actually travels in your system — from collection through storage, processing, and deletion.
02
Check tracking and cookies
Verify that consent signals propagate correctly, cookie categories are accurate, and third-party scripts behave as declared.
03
Compare implementation with legal documentation
Find the delta between what your privacy policy claims and what your codebase, infra, and vendors actually do.
04
Translate GDPR / AI Act requirements into technical next steps
Turn legal obligations into a prioritized backlog your engineering team can actually act on.
05
Work alongside legal, product, and engineering
Bridge the gap between legal counsel and development teams — I speak both languages fluently.
GDPR
Reality
Check

Start where you are.

Compliance Reality Check

One-time engagement

Know where you're at risk within days — not months.

A focused, one-time review of a specific system, feature, cookie setup, or AI use case. You get a clear picture of where documentation and implementation diverge — and what to do about it.

Contact me →

Implementation Support

Custom scope

Turn compliance into working system behavior.

For companies that need more than a review. I work alongside your team to turn compliance requirements into real system changes — from technical specifications through to verified implementation.

Contact me →

Gaps I've found.
Anonymised.

Every case below is a real example. The companies thought they were compliant. Their systems told a different story.

Gap discovered

Tracking cookie vs cache object

A cookie was classified as "functional" in the consent interface. Technical analysis showed it was used for cross-session user tracking — requiring explicit consent that was never collected.

Cookie audit
Gap discovered

TCF implementation mismatch

The IAB Transparency & Consent Framework was correctly integrated at the banner level. But consent signals weren't propagating to all downstream vendors — meaning third parties were firing without valid consent.

Consent framework
Gap discovered

Shared data responsibility model

Two business entities were jointly processing personal data. Each assumed the other held controller responsibility. Neither had documented or agreed on a joint-controllership arrangement.

Data governance
Gap discovered

Data controller mapping

Internal systems were processing personal data — names, emails, behavioural records — that had never been mapped to a legal basis in the Record of Processing Activities.

ROPA / Legal basis
Gap discovered

Data controller intake form

A vendor onboarding process collected personal data from contacts before a Data Processing Agreement had been signed — creating a compliance exposure window at the point of first contact.

Vendor management

Let's check if your compliance actually holds up.

Book a free 30-minute call. No pitch — just an honest look at your current situation. I'll tell you what I see and whether I can help.